Should the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC might dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced a possibility to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this will likely be only performed if the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. From the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence and also the petitioner company responded on the allegations as a result they were properly conscious of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use to be seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution can be justified when The fundamental norm underlying a Constitution disappears along with a new system is place in its place.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the learned counsel to the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as the issues on the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(1) on the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession of the subjected premises towards the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to be decided because of the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as being the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer inside the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court needs to see this element for interim custody of the topic premises When the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
The loads of this power casts an obligation about the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for any crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it really is made obvious that police is free to consider action against any person that's indulged in criminal activities subject matter to legislation. 8. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two months, address the alleged police misconduct. When the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, and they shall be assigned non-industry duties within the interim period. Read more
13 . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some length, both parties have agreed into the disposal of the moment petition about the premise that the DIGP Malir will hear the petitioner and also private respondents and will acquire care of many of the areas of the case and assure that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
Civil Courts retain jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it demands legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be developed and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were told in the boy’s past, they requested if their children were Harmless with him in their home. The therapist assured them that they'd almost nothing to fret about.
However it's made very clear that police is free to get action against any person who's indulged in criminal activities subject matter to regulation. However no harassment shall be caused to your petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of regulation. Police shall also assure respect in the family get rid of in accordance with legislation and when they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they're able to act, as far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall protected concrete evidence and acquire necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate being a issue of security with the house is concerned, which isn't public place under the Act 1977. 9. Thinking about the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition is reached. As a result, this petition is hereby disposed of during the terms stated higher than. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads forty Order Date: 08-APR-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Summaries offer concise insights into the legal principles governing agreements between parties, including the formation, interpretation, and enforceability of contracts, giving a beneficial resource for understanding contractual rights and obligations.
500,000/- (Rupees 5 hundred thousand only) Every single as well as the same shall be held during the police station for the effect read more that no harm shall be caused to your petitioners. 5. In view of the above, this Constitutional Petition is disposed of Read more
12 . Const. P. 245/2025 (S.B.) Qurban Ali S/o Qasim V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair to the offender along with the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court together with from other courts but they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.
The different roles of case legislation in civil and common law traditions create differences in the best way that courts render decisions. Common legislation courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale powering their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and often interpret the broader legal principles.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy from the information contained on this site, or the information linked to around the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
States also normally have courts that tackle only a specific subset of legal matters, which include family regulation and probate. Case regulation, also known as precedent or common regulation, could be the body of prior judicial decisions that guide judges deciding issues before them. Depending to the relationship between the deciding court along with the precedent, case law might be binding or merely persuasive. For example, a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for your Fifth Circuit is binding on all federal district courts within the Fifth Circuit, but a court sitting down in California (whether a federal or state court) is not really strictly bound to Keep to the Fifth Circuit’s prior decision. Similarly, a decision by just one district court in The big apple is just not binding on another district court, but the initial court’s reasoning may well help guide the second court in reaching its decision. Decisions via the U.S. Supreme Court are binding on all federal and state courts. Read more